|

Introduction:
Of all the Caribbean territories, Guyana is the most paradoxical and that
is apart from the fact that it has the largest landmass in the region and
some of the best and the brightest. It is also the poorest, and in the area
of public companies it is the only country which despite having fourteen
(14) companies registered with the Securities Council, has none which have
opted to list on the stock exchange. Even if one discounts those companies
such as ON Energy, Globe Trust & Investment Inc, and Property Holdings
Incorporated, J P Santos and Company Limited and Caribbean Containers Inc,
the reasons for none of the other companies seeking to list on the exchange
are hard to fathom.
Part of it lies of course in the fact that these companies are by law
allowed to trade on the exchange and, with their generally narrow focus, see
little benefit in submitting themselves to more supervision and regulation.
By contrast there are some one hundred and seven companies in the region
which are listed on their domestic exchanges mainly in the manufacturing and
financial services sectors (Table 1). As we shall see later some are now
moving out of their 'home' countries and listing on other exchanges as well
(Table 2).
Try explaining this:
The exclusion of Guyana from the list of listed companies is one of the
hardest things to explain to regional colleagues. Admittedly Guyana is
perhaps the only country where the private sector has found it rather easy
to move to the courts to gag the securities regulator. Yet, we are not the
only country with governance problems, whether actual or perceived. The CTIR
writing about Equity Market Structures and Cross-Border Development noted
that "There is a general perception that corporate behaviour in the
Caribbean is non-transparent and that there exist information asymmetries in
the market place. Many of the market structures of the host jurisdictions
comprise monopolies and oligopolies. Moreover, the regulators of corporate
behaviour are perceived, at best, to be ineffectual in the encouragement of
appropriate corporate behaviour."

If that is a faithful reflection of the reality in the rest of the region
where the regulators and the market swiftly penalise recalcitrant companies,
just imagine how Guyana's landscape would be described. And that brings us
back to the question why is no company willing to list when according to
GASCI, the benefits include:
The ease of raising equity compared to what an unlisted issuer would
face.
the greater appeal of listed companies for overseas and institutional
investors;
the capacity of a listed company index to attract more publicity than an
unlisted company;
greater investor confidence;
the opportunity to enhance their image for both internal and external
markets;
higher share prices than unlisted companies;
the fact that only listed companies can be cross-listed on regional
exchanges;
obligations and cost.
Naturally, listing carries with it certain conditions, but these seem
disproportionately small compared with the potential benefits. Some of the
requirements set out in the GASCI Rules include an adequate trading record;
audited accounts for 3 financial years; an open market in the securities;
that at least 20% of the securities must be in public hands with a minimum
of 100 shareholders; a market value or shareholders' funds of not less than
500 million dollars with not less than 100,000 shares held by a minimum of
50 shareholders; no conflict between the interests of the shareholders of
the issuer and any private or competing interests of its directors;
independent directors and freely transferable securities.
The financial cost too does not appear too onerous and insignificant when
compared with what directors are prepared to pay in legal fees to shelter
them from the regulator.
What makes the reluctance to list even stranger is that the listing rules
had the blessing of persons associated with companies that now refuse to
list and who perhaps hypocritically are lamenting the fact that no one is
listing.
Leaving Guyana behind:
And while we ponder this mystery our economy languishes and regional
competitors move away and ahead in seizing the opportunities - including
right here in Guyana - offered by globalisation and the CSME, and are ready
to cross-list on other stock exchanges. Cross-listing refers to the placing
of securities which are already listed on a domestic stock exchange on the
official list of the exchange in another country or countries allowing
investors to buy and sell securities across borders in a system where trades
are executed based on the regulations of the exchange on which the trade is
executed.
There has been an increasing tendency to cross-list by the larger
Caribbean countries. More important than the sheer absurdity of having
non-Guyana companies being the only listed companies on our exchange is the
potential impact on the economy, the exchange rate and the cost of funds to
our Guyana companies if the investing public shifts their investment
portfolio from the domestic companies to the regional companies. Such a move
would be highly advantageous as exchange risks are minimised, dividends at
the rate of zero per cent are earned in foreign currency and investors see
themselves as part of a bigger and possibly better entity with better
corporate governance practices.
The CTIR identifies a number of benefits a cross-listed company is
presumed to enjoy. These include: the cross-listed company is assumed to
have met the criteria for listing in its domestic jurisdiction as well as
have a consistent track record of full compliance with the territory's
listing rules and other regulatory requirements. The CTIR goes on to point
out that experience has shown that the announcement of a cross-listing and
the subsequent listing on any of the regional stock exchanges is usually
well received by local investors because the illiquid markets harbour a pool
of persons always on the look out for new investment opportunities.
Next week we continue this discussion on listing and cross-listing and
the implications for Guyana.
Business Page acknowledges the permission of the Caricom Secretariat for
the use of the Caribbean Trade and Investment Report 2005.

|