|
The year is far from over but it has been one of the worst in the
last fifty years, at least in res-pect of natural disasters across the
world. In our hemisphere, the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season has been
record-breaking, and every day you wonder whether the end is really in
sight. Twenty-three named storms, 13 hurricanes, billions of dollars in
damage and of course, the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people.
The wealthy and mighty United States can hardly pick itself up from one
hurricane only to find another on its way, leaving a trail of death and
destruction and a people struggling for explanations. For President George
Bush whose vision of a democratic Middle East in the image and likeness of
the West has all but evaporated, the nightmare now must be how to declare
victory and leave. The US economy is now the largest debtor nation and the
well-known hubris of the American is muted.
Nicaragua, Guatemala, Mexico and Cuba reel from one hurricane while
dreading the next. Having lost a large part of Montserrat, the Caribbean saw
Grenada suffering more than 70 per cent damage to its building stock in the
wealthier half of the island; the largest region of Guyana - the land of
many waters - was under too much water for several weeks; Barbados and
Trinidad and Tobago have been brushed by some strong winds and unexpected
waves, while high tides have recently threatened most of the Caribbean.
No explanation:
Despite all the advances in science, there is no generally agreed
explanation for these many natural disasters. Some say it is Global warming
while others say it is a punishment on America for its immoral and illegal
war in Iraq, but then are unable to explain the earthquake in Pakistan or
the tsunami in the largely non-Christian South East Asia, BSE and foot and
mouth in cattle, the current threat of a bird flu pandemic, the apparent
incurability of HIV/ AIDS and the recurring man-made crises in Africa. Add
to this the fact that international terrorism is now part of the armoury of
powerful, if evil men, and we have a world that is facing one of its worst
crises in recorded history. Iraq has exposed America's strategic
deficiencies, and Katrina its managerial capabilities. The UN is embroiled
in its own domestic shortcomings, while Germany, one of Europe's most
powerful states is struggling to have a stable government. On top of this,
Iran, one of Islam's most powerful countries is challenging Israel's right
to exist, President Chirac of France threatens to derail a world trade deal
and the oil price continues its inexorable rise. America has become a
recipient of emergency aid; Cuba finally is accepting assistance from the
US; Pakistan, OXFAM, the Red Cross and other international agencies are
complaining about the inadequacy and speed of international disaster relief
efforts, and the demand for personnel outstrips supply. If you are still
optimistic please do not be embarrassed to show it by raising your right
hand.
Outlook:
Yet for all the bad news there is still the consolation that the world
survived the depression of the Twenties and Thirties, two world wars, the
oil crisis of the seventies and the threat of wars between the then two
super powers. Indeed, the world not only survived these challenges, but in
most cases actually became stronger. What then is the outlook for the next
year?
Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund Rodrigo de Rato, in
remarks made at the Spain-US Chamber of Commerce, Miami, Florida, last month
said that the consensus of the management of the IMF based on all the
reviews, studies and discussions with policy-makers from all the countries
of the world was that not only was the state of the world economy good, but
"indeed so good that it presents a great opportunity to make reforms that
would improve prospects further - because it's usually less politically
painful to make policy adjustments when economies are strong."
He noted that the global economy has been strong over the past couple of
years with growth in 2004 being the highest in three decades. He predicted
that growth would continue at a "good pace in 2005 and 2006, despite a
number of recent shocks, including higher oil prices and two hurricanes in
the United States." Global real GDP is expected to grow by over four per
cent in 2005 and 2006.
Weeds in the garden:
Not everything in the garden was rosy, as economic performance had not
been even across the world, while global inflation had picked up slightly
but remained moderate despite higher oil prices. The USA which continues to
drive the world economy has shown remarkable resilience, and is expected to
recover from the effects of Katrina and Rita within a short period as
reconstruction efforts pick up, and the profits of US corporations both
inside and outside of America remain steady. Mr De Rato added, however, that
unless the major economic powers took appropriate policy action, "there are
serious risks that the world economy will not stay in such good shape for
much longer." He identified the following among the measures having "general
consensus":
1) the US needs to reduce its budget and current account deficits but he
stopped short of calling for the reversal of the Bush give-to-the-rich tax
policies which have exacerbated the fiscal situation;
2) other large countries need to make reforms to increase productive
investment and demand in their economies; and
3) some countries in emerging Asia need increased flexibility in their
exchange rates.
Other risks would include the continuing rise in oil prices, major
terrorist activities, the continuing civil strife particularly in some
countries in Africa and Asia and further natural disasters.
Perhaps the worst risk is the likelihood that the necessary structural
reforms will not be undertaken with the commitment and timeliness which is
so necessary. But even with all the natural and man-made dangers, the
world's economy is likely to perform well in 2005 and 2006. Next week we
will look at how the Guyana economy has underperformed under then Finance
Minister and now President Jagdeo, and the urgent need to have major changes
at the level of the political management of the economy.
 |