Chopping
Heads - A Solution?
Introduction
You do not have to be
interested in the more arcane business press to know the large number of
companies and other forms of businesses which have found themselves in
death-threatening conditions. This condition is not unique to Guyana or
common to any particular type of industry or sector. While it is true that
some of the failures involve colossal amounts and some of the more high
profile companies, the reality is that many companies struggle to keep their
heads above water which in business terms translate into a positive cash
flow. Whether it is competitive pressure, shoddy products, customer service
dissatisfaction, incompetent management, or the recently in vogue poor
business-model, more and more businesses are failing or on the verge of
collapse.
Not withstanding the brave
face put on by the senior personalities involved in such companies, business
failure usually has a terrible psychological effect on those involved. It is
an admission of failure and for this reason several action is taken in
secret, fearing that publicity will cause embarrassment outside of the
company and even recriminations within.
Rather than biting the
bullet and taking strong and effective measures, decisions are usually
delayed, sometimes for several years, until only drastic surgery can save
the business, if at all. Forced with such an extreme situation, management
of troubled companies usually makes the decision to cut everything in sight
because cost cutting is seen as the answer to turning their fortunes around.
A cash crunch and loss of
market position, termination of supplier credit, and providers of finance
bring about the oftentimes belated restructuring moves that are designed to
fix overnight problems that have resulted from years of poor business and
operating decisions and practices. In the process, the negative impact on
morale is often ignored and many businesses continue to flounder as the axe
is wielded with scant regard for the damage the act of widespread layoffs
causes. This is because cost-cutting is often done without the benefit of
proper planning and it is not unusual to find that the wrong things have
been sacrificed.
Before considering
cost-cutting in some detail it might be worth determining all the options
available to the company and a voluntary liquidation or the sale of the
business should not be ruled out. But there are other options as well –
asset-reduction strategies are often very effective because of the
significant sums which might come in. Where the strategy involves the
disposal of sections of the business, management is freed up to concentrate
on a smaller set of problems. It is also possible to reduce current assets
such as inventories and receivables as well as sell and lease back some of
the more substantial assets.
The options are not few and
many of the companies’ suppliers, creditors and lenders are often more
understanding and patient than they are usually credited for. The important
thing is to convince them that one is serious, that the burdens of
adjustment are being equally shared and that there is integrity in the
process. But for now we will return to the option of cost cutting.
Impossible
Objective
While in any crisis
situation in business, cost cutting and saving cash are essential the people
within the entity cannot be ignored. It is impossible for a turnaround to be
achieved if those remaining employees are not willing to strain their every
fibre to support management’s efforts to right the ship.
There is little margin for
error and tasks must be carried out with higher levels of efficiency than
previously the norm yet those who must do so cannot be guaranteed of their
future. To continue the metaphor, instinct may very well tell them to jump
ship. This apparent impossible objective of ensuring maximum in a situation
where even the future can no longer be taken for granted, effort can only be
fostered in an environment where people understand, believe and are willing
to support management actions – a triumph of faith over expectation.
Relationships
Managers must recognise that
in the current set of circumstances they are being scrutinised under a
microscope by everyone. The leadership must therefore step up and out and
show its ability to function under intense and sometimes conflicting
pressure. It must recognise that there are many challenges within and
outside the organisation that must be dealt with. Management must be
prepared to confront these with the attitudes that inspire confidence of
those around, be they customers or employees.
For any measure of success
to be achieved, enduring relationships must be built that will help to move
the company into a stronger position. These relationships must be fostered
with employees, customers, suppliers and everyone on whom the survival of
the organisation depends.
Trust
This brings us to the
question of trust, which in the current environment is justifiably not a
word that is easily or readily associated with corporate life. While
employees are called upon to be reasonable in the demands, sometimes
agreeing to cuts in wages and benefits, they must be convinced that top
management is doing at least its proportionate share and indeed has not
acted without integrity in the past. Trust and confidence are not obtained
overnight but can be destroyed very quickly. It is a safe bet that in
addition to incompetent management there were some actions by the management
of any entity in trouble that served to erode trust that may have taken
years to cultivate. The
question is how do the leaders focus on rebuilding confidence with all the
chaos and problems swirling around.
Integrity
The people at the top of
organisations must be prepared to show that they have always been committed
to the entity, its customers and employees and by displaying the highest
levels of integrity. When the stakes are high as is case when the survival
of the company is at risk, honesty and forthrightness are even more
necessary. While candor it is not always the easiest thing in the world, its
absence can be damaging when trust has been eroded. Customers must be made
aware of what can be delivered and what cannot and employees must understand
that once a commitment is made it must be met or all efforts at regaining
confidence are being wasted.
Conclusion
Competence is another
ingredient that is required because if any sign of incompetence is evident
trust goes out the window. This is can be seen in all organisational
relationships since customers have little patience with incompetence,
superiors have little faith in employees who cannot function and employees
do not respect and support managers who do not have the requisite skills. Of
course any good leader must recognise where weaknesses exist and ensure that
while perfection is desirable everyone including himself will have areas
where support is needed. The leader must then ensure that the required
support is provided quickly in the area where it is most needed.
It may seem trite but an
organisation is successful if it works on certain fundamental principles and
tries to stay the course without significant departures from them. It must
comprise of people working towards the same goal with a high level of skill,
integrity and commitment to its raison d’ętre,
whatever that may be. While this is not the magic potion that is expected
from the legion of esteemed consultants out there, it usually works.
|