THE IMPERATIVE OF EFFICIENCY
Introduction
Increasingly quality is becoming a
delicate mix of technological and human capabilities. In the production
line it is the highly computerised and sophisticated equipment that
drives production but quality is still largely and inevitably a matter
for the keen eye of the quality controllers again using technology as
part of his tools. In the newspaper business it is equally a matter of
people - reporters and editors followed by printing and again quality
controllers. In the food and tourism related sector it is almost all
people as it is in offices and among the sales force. To compete
successfully is to recognise this mix.
Even as we recognise this however, many
if not most of our talent keeps draining away - in search of a better
opportunity and in protest against the continuing low standards and
service in Guyana. The task of quality improvement is truly a race
without end - the trained ones soon leave and the poor manager has to
start all over again. Many managers resort to poaching rather than
training, only to find that the catch is untrained and looking for more
money.
The competitive business environment is
forcibly hammering home the lesson that survival of an entity is
dependent on increased efficiency and productivity. People determine the
level of productivity and it is of great concern that if there is not a
drastic change in attitude we will be unable to compete.
Quality Decline
Against the trend of what is needed,
there has been an appalling decline in standards and in just about every
area of life in Guyana mediocrity has become increasingly acceptable. As
badly as our physical infrastructure has decayed, the disintegration of
the value system which demands excellence is more catastrophic. It seems
almost in vogue to settle for less quality, less thoughtfulness, less
courtesy and less service. Too often is a sound work ethic ridiculed as
if it is something to be ashamed of. While many have got used to and
even become part of this "culture", it is frightening to think
many of our younger generation have lived with it all their lives and
know nothing else. They see few good examples among community and church
leaders and a business culture with little regard for ethical values.
While all the best theories and reasons
can be advanced there can be no excuse, we have all contributed to the
decline by our unwillingness to deal with it forcefully. Many managers
have often made concessions on quality of products and service that have
seemingly endorsed the inefficiency that is now rampant in our midst.
Indeed many managers prefer to make excuses for their company’s shoddy
work and attempting to defend the indefensible rather than acknowledging
the mistakes and giving satisfaction to the customer. A business can
only sustain or improve productivity if it has policies and practices in
place that foster quality and are intolerant of poor standards.
Punctuality or rather lack of it in the
private and public sectors is one of the principal manifestations of the
malaise which affects productivity gains. Managers must insist that
people report for work on time and work the hours for which they are
paid. The most annoying occurrence is to call or visit some business
place to find that the posted hours of work are meaningless. Management
should not allow employees to take what is in fact an unauthorised pay
increase and should pay only for the actual hours worked.
But then again the manager who behaves as
though rules do not apply to him and who is never on time for an
appointment would be hard put to demand better from subordinates.
Sometimes an equally upsetting experience is the time wasted on an
appointment that is constantly interrupted by telephone calls. It may
stem from a sense of self-importance but taking or making calls during a
meeting is time-wasting, rude and disrespectful. It shows total
disregard for the other person's time and should not be tolerated.
Another bothersome issue on the subject
of the telephone is the lack of attention paid to its proper usage. Few
companies seem to appreciate how the telephone can enhance and improve
their efficiency, productivity and image. Three simple rules should be
observed:
- Phones should be answered pleasantly
and courteously;
- Calls should be promptly directed to
the appropriate parties; and
- Messages should be accurately
communicated and calls returned as soon as possible.
No telephones should be left unattended
because no one likes to call a business place during office hours and
not reach someone. Efficient companies ensure that all phones are
answered promptly even during staff meetings. It should also be standard
practice that calls are returned promptly since clients or customers
expect that courtesy.
Offices are using increasingly advanced
systems for answering their telephones but these too must be subject to
human management.
Correspondence
Correspondence should also be dealt with
expeditiously and there is nothing wrong with insisting that mail be
responded to promptly. Last Thursday I sent off an e-mail to one of the
US Ernst and Young offices at 9.36am. A response came back at 9.43am -
seven minutes later! On the outside letters should be answered in 24
hours unless the issues involved are extremely complex and require
research. Cases of this nature should still be responded to immediately
with an indication of when all the required information will be
forwarded. Pending trays belong to Jurassic Park - let us not re-create
them.
It is not easy to be an outstanding
company but excellence can be achieved if the owners and managers have
the integrity and values necessary for success. Once a commitment is
made, it is imperative that it is honoured in both letter and spirit.
Sales pitches often promise the very best - the highest quality
merchandise, the most skillful craftsmanship, reliable after sales
service. The public must demand what is promised. The gap between the
promise and reality must be narrowed if a company is to survive. In the
long run, loyalty, respect, success and profitability will be the reward
for those who strive for excellence and deliver value, those with
integrity.
Many of these areas do not require any
major outlay in funds by businesses, and in fact will improve profits
because of greater productivity. It should be transmitted to all
employees that every policy put in place is meant to demonstrate respect
for the customer, the public and fellow employees. Disrespect for any of
these groups is the most destructive and expensive mistake companies can
make. Beliefs and values of the ownership and management determine the
level of success a business will achieve and maintain. Creating an
environment in which people are courteous, sensitive and have respect
for others is a proven method of improving productivity.
Conclusion
A company's personality is usually a
reflection of its owners or management and setting standards of
excellence is not elitist. Employees who constantly refuse to conform to
such standards do irreparable damage to the productive capability of
those around them and ultimately to the business as a whole. Certain
individuals continually try to impose their poor standards on an
organisation and weak management will only contribute to this. Just as
an individual is judged by the company he or she keeps, so is a company
measured by the employees it retains. Remember that you do not have to
be part of the overall decline in standards and values. Everyone can
make a difference! It is time stop making excuses for shoddiness and
mediocrity. The economy is full of promise and opportunity but local
businesses are faced with growing competition from foreign companies.
This challenge will not be successfully warded off by the faint of
heart. Let us as a nation make a commitment to excellence, our survival
depends on it.
Standards of course are not a matter for
the private sector alone. Telephone calls to Ministers, ministries and
government departments are seldom returned. The Public Service Ministry
should set up a Unit to help train all public servants including
Ministers about efficiency and telephone manners. The Government after
all is the largest organisation in the country. It is also supposed to
be the facilitator for the private sector. It must set the example. |